<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for hostedtechnologysolutions.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog</link>
	<description>Hosted Technology Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:27:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-Virus Solutions by TechHost</title>
		<link>http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog/2006/11/18/anti-virus-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>TechHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog/2006/11/18/anti-virus-solutions/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Wow, what an old post! Times change, as do AV solutions. While F-Secure provided good protection, its weight (resource requirements) and unfriendly-to-the-user aspects provided challenges. We used the PSB Portal for about 4 years. After about 2 years we kept waiting for improvements in design and function, none of which came. The long for promised FSAV Macintosh version was finally released reminding me of the vapor-ware issues of old. So we moved. 
It was a challenge to find the balance between form, function, and fit. ESET became our choice. Light weight, both in size and resource demand; effective, especially with the &quot;in the wild&quot; code now so prevalent on the Internet; manageable with ERA Server and Console.
Will we ever be happy with AV solutions? Are we too demanding? Mayhaps that be true.  Even ESET leaves me a bit challenged yet it&#039;s more with depth than lacking. The ESET Remote Access Console has granularity that can be, at times, confusing with the disparate view between local console (in advance mode) and what&#039;s seen in the ERA Console. Yet once dialed in, ESET proves to be a great addition to a network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what an old post! Times change, as do AV solutions. While F-Secure provided good protection, its weight (resource requirements) and unfriendly-to-the-user aspects provided challenges. We used the PSB Portal for about 4 years. After about 2 years we kept waiting for improvements in design and function, none of which came. The long for promised FSAV Macintosh version was finally released reminding me of the vapor-ware issues of old. So we moved.<br />
It was a challenge to find the balance between form, function, and fit. ESET became our choice. Light weight, both in size and resource demand; effective, especially with the &#8220;in the wild&#8221; code now so prevalent on the Internet; manageable with ERA Server and Console.<br />
Will we ever be happy with AV solutions? Are we too demanding? Mayhaps that be true.  Even ESET leaves me a bit challenged yet it&#8217;s more with depth than lacking. The ESET Remote Access Console has granularity that can be, at times, confusing with the disparate view between local console (in advance mode) and what&#8217;s seen in the ERA Console. Yet once dialed in, ESET proves to be a great addition to a network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Converting a Dell XPS laptop from Vista to XP Pro by TechHost</title>
		<link>http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog/2008/05/08/23/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>TechHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog/?p=23#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Was it a Dell workstation? If so, and if you have the Dell OS installer disks, I&#039;ve yet to see where a serial number is needed. And you are legal, at least by what I&#039;ve read at Microsoft&#039;s site re downgrading. 

Let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it a Dell workstation? If so, and if you have the Dell OS installer disks, I&#8217;ve yet to see where a serial number is needed. And you are legal, at least by what I&#8217;ve read at Microsoft&#8217;s site re downgrading. </p>
<p>Let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Converting a Dell XPS laptop from Vista to XP Pro by gennaro</title>
		<link>http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog/2008/05/08/23/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>gennaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog/?p=23#comment-170</guid>
		<description>what about serial numbers and registration? I bought a workstation with XP downgrade - it come with only Vista CDs, and XP was preinstalled with some recovery sistem on the same HD that I lost by partitionig with sysrescuecd - so also if I have other XP CDs I can&#039;t be &quot;legal&quot; because I have lost my SN.
Any advice?
thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about serial numbers and registration? I bought a workstation with XP downgrade &#8211; it come with only Vista CDs, and XP was preinstalled with some recovery sistem on the same HD that I lost by partitionig with sysrescuecd &#8211; so also if I have other XP CDs I can&#8217;t be &#8220;legal&#8221; because I have lost my SN.<br />
Any advice?<br />
thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Nostalgia Factory leaves bad memories by TechHost</title>
		<link>http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog/the-nostalgia-factory-leaves-bad-memories/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>TechHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostedtechnologysolutions.com/techblog/?page_id=32#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Wow. I&#039;m shocked. Without ANY response from the folks at nostalgia.com., I received a notification from PayPal today that &quot;You&#039;ve (yeah, me) got a payment&quot;. Shocked. 

What&#039;s funny is that although I wanted to call them daily and follow up with more daily emails, I&#039;ve only had the time to send one added email in the last week--and no phone calls. Work has kept me blessedly busy. 

So here&#039;s my update: it took persistent, tenacious (but not very consistent) pursuit of this company to get my monies refunded. 

Only $19.75...and with the weak US dollar, I&#039;d probably have been better off paying in peso&#039;s, but allowing &quot;them&quot; to keep my hard won funds does little good for me, or anyone else out there. Buyer beware: make sure you do your due diligence when dealing with ANY firm: internet based or not. 

Be at peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I&#8217;m shocked. Without ANY response from the folks at nostalgia.com., I received a notification from PayPal today that &#8220;You&#8217;ve (yeah, me) got a payment&#8221;. Shocked. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s funny is that although I wanted to call them daily and follow up with more daily emails, I&#8217;ve only had the time to send one added email in the last week&#8211;and no phone calls. Work has kept me blessedly busy. </p>
<p>So here&#8217;s my update: it took persistent, tenacious (but not very consistent) pursuit of this company to get my monies refunded. </p>
<p>Only $19.75&#8230;and with the weak US dollar, I&#8217;d probably have been better off paying in peso&#8217;s, but allowing &#8220;them&#8221; to keep my hard won funds does little good for me, or anyone else out there. Buyer beware: make sure you do your due diligence when dealing with ANY firm: internet based or not. </p>
<p>Be at peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

